Ignore economic principles at your peril
24 Oct 2007
I woke with a start this morning with the realisation that economics is alive and well. What caused this? The public statements by transportation providers trying to convince us otherwise. Let me give you some examples.
The US Transportation Security Administration, in their press release of August 9, cautioned about tight space as the peak season progresses. They also projected total transpacific to US trade will grow 7 against 2006. Yet US West Coast port statistics point to an actual decline in volumes for a couple of months and the realistic projection of growth for 2007 is less than 3% growth. Furthermore, there is absolutely no sign of congestion at any US port.
The US West Coast railroads have also experienced another economic principle - price elasticity. Increases in rail costs have apparently found the boundary of the price elasticities. There is an imbalance of westbound empty containers, i.e. fulls are moving east, but they are not returning empty in the same number.
At the same time, the US East Coast ports are reporting a sharp increase in empty container handling, suggesting that an inland move from the Midwest eastward is cheaper than westward. As boxes are not in such high demand in Asia due to the slow-down in trade, carriers can take their time returning the empties and are using the All Water vessels via Panama.
The lesson to be drawn from this is that at the end of the day, economic principals do apply, even in an era of globalisation and we are at peril if we ignore this. The extension of this thought to the Asia-Europe trade is a cause for concern. Too much new capacity may be chasing a market not growing at double digit rates beyond 2007. Are carriers headed for a hard landing?





