Cutting ties
23 Apr 2008
The time for the establishment of "independent port regulators" is, in our view, most definitely upon us. With the promise of objective rulings on port tariffs, handling charges and other key aspects of the price/service equation, port authorities that find it difficult to let go will be restrained.
So often when port authorities decide to “keep a hand in” the day-to-day running of nominally privatised port businesses it is with the objective of being able to cap prices and require minimum levels of service.
The presence of a truly independent regulator – i.e. not the port authority or the relevant ministry but a real arm’s length regulator - would go a long way towards eliminating what the incoming investor invariably sees as an unhealthy tinkering.
The concept, however, of an independent regulator – as is often found in the telecommunications or energy sectors – is not one that has really been embraced on a large scale by the international ports sector. It is nevertheless one that appears worthy of some examination and if readers do have experience of this then it would be most interesting to hear about it and to share this experience with other Port Strategy readers. Please do contact the Editor if you have ideas and/or knowledge in this area; we are very interested to hear from you.
Acquisition, however, is not something that is a straightforward process as Maersk’s purchase of P&O Nedlloyd proved. In fact, it can prove to have serious landmines attached to it. Integrating two large entities and maintaining market share is not a challenge to be faced by the faint-hearted. Consequently, it will be interesting to watch this process unfold, see how many serious bidders emerge, what eventually happens with the line and the degree of success achieved following its acquisition. All the more so as the sale will take place in a marketplace that looks set to be somewhat patchy in its health over the next few months.
Certainly it is interesting food for thought as to what the big shipping line acquisition offers to a major player when you contrast it to the type of tactic pursued by CMA-CGM in recent times. This Top 5 container line has just announced a stunning set of results which included carrying 7.68m teu, an increase of 29% over the previous year, and realising a net profit which rose by 58% to $966m on a turnover of $11.8bn. Its strategy for expansion has basically been to rely on organic growth – in 2007 it opened 42 new services – coupled with the acquisition of three niche carriers, Cheng Lie, Comanav and US Lines. It is a strategy that looks to have considerable merit when judged against its 2007 results. And of course another large scale merger, sale or consolidation will undoubtedly have an impact on port calls as the overlaps are removed and/or routes are revised. Certainly one to watch from a port perspective.





