Friday 5 December 08 - 12:19
 

Cargo Handling: Dangerous Goods

Keeping hazards in check

On the European side of the Atlantic, news that a shipment of weapons-ready plutonium was to be taken in an unarmed ship from Sellafield in Cumbria to France caused a media furore recently. The material has to be shipped because Sellafield had to call on its French competitor for help in fulfilling an order.

Martin Forwood of Core, a Cumbrian campaign group, claimed hundreds of kilograms of plutonium, sufficient for a large number of dirty bombs, and Liberal Democrat Steve Webb, the party’s environment spokesman, called the shipment a threat to the country’s national security.

That sort of instance would be easy to police and protect, but thorough examination of every container moving through every port in the world would be a much taller, time-consuming order, calling for equipment with a degree of sophistication. That’s because not everything exhibiting radiation is necessarily a threat, since some cargoes have it naturally – and that’s a broad church, including such diverse items as bananas, roof tiles and cat litter, to mention but a few.

Quite apart from concerns about what’s contained in within a cargo, and its potential to be a problem at its destination, dangerous cargoes pose threats to ships themselves. The Hyundai Fortune and Hanjin Pennsylvania were both victims of explosions; the former carrying a cargo valued at $140m, and the latter of $50m, which fell victim to an explosion involving fireworks.

Motorship