Email email Print print

DO TERMINAL OPERATORS KNOW EXACTLY HOW MUCH THEY ARE PAYING FOR THEIR LIGHTING?

01 Dec 2004

While operational factors obviously dictate the distribution of lighting within a terminal, do operators have a clear idea of exactly how much their bills come to?

Steve Cameron of Cameron Management Resources reports that Swedish manufacturer Prismalence has also made a significant technological breakthrough. "Prismalence lighting uses more of the light spectrum and gives a much brighter, whiter light, which improves overall night time vision. It also uses significantly less power, generating savings of at least 50% in a terminal's electricity bill, while the manufacturer claims that bills can be cut by up to two-thirds depending on the technical specification involved. This is simply because you need less light.

Frans Jol, managing director of Salerno Container Terminal (SCT) in Italy, insists he is well aware of how much it costs to light SCT. "We had to change the lighting at the port recently to bring it in line with ISPS Code requirements. Costing usage is easy to calculate and kept entirely separate from other outgoings. Fortunately, the upgrading work required falls within the remit of the port authority; SCT does not have to pay!"

Dennis Hepworth says that Jol's grasp of his lighting costs is typical of big ports, where electricity consumption is keenly monitored as part of a terminal operation's overall cost base. However, as he explained to PS, this is not always the key point, emphasising that whenever he is invited to visit a terminal installation, he is often immediately struck by how over- or under-lit it can be. In other words, there are a lot of terminals out there spending too much on their lighting, while others might be able to improve their operational efficiency by spending a bit more.




Business News - Sign Up Today!

Email news News feeds
Magazines Networks