{"id":3272,"date":"2010-07-11T12:03:00","date_gmt":"2010-07-11T11:03:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/portstrategy.nfdtesting.uk\/coastlink\/2010\/07\/11\/complaints-continue-from-paita\/"},"modified":"2010-07-11T12:03:00","modified_gmt":"2010-07-11T11:03:00","slug":"complaints-continue-from-paita","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/coastlink\/2010\/07\/11\/complaints-continue-from-paita\/","title":{"rendered":"Complaints continue from Paita"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It is also pointed out that rising costs imposed by TPE have forced three shipping lines (Evergreen, CCAV and NYK) to cease operating at the terminal.<\/p>\n<p>The exporters claimed that TPE effectively has a monopoly over certain operations, which has allowed them to impose higher tariffs. They would therefore like to see the original concession renegotiated.<\/p>\n<p>TPE, for its part, said that productivity has risen by 20% as a result of being able to turn ships around much faster than before.<\/p>\n<p>Furthermore, it claims it is providing a better service all round, having upgraded security and brought in more equipment. It would like to complete dredging work to allow post-panamax vessels to call.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Exporters using the Peruvian port of Paita, as well as the local chamber of commerce, have revealed that there are irregularities in the contract signed between Terminales Portuarios Euroandinos (TPE) and Proinversi\u00f3n, the state body which awarded its concession.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[],"sponsor":[],"class_list":["post-3272","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-south-america"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/coastlink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3272","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/coastlink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/coastlink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/coastlink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/coastlink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3272"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/coastlink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3272\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/coastlink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3272"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/coastlink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3272"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/coastlink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3272"},{"taxonomy":"sponsor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/coastlink\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/sponsor?post=3272"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}