{"id":1551,"date":"2009-04-05T12:24:00","date_gmt":"2009-04-05T11:24:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/portstrategy.nfdtesting.uk\/greenport-congress\/2009\/04\/05\/volume-wobbles-in-brazil\/"},"modified":"2026-08-27T13:31:07","modified_gmt":"2026-08-27T12:31:07","slug":"volume-wobbles-in-brazil","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/news\/north-america\/volume-wobbles-in-brazil\/","title":{"rendered":"Volume wobbles in Brazil"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The port of Itaja\u00ed, whose draught was severely limited following heavy rains at the end of last year, has been unable to accept some consignments.<\/p>\n<p>This has indirectly benefited the port of S\u00e3o Francisco, where exports in January were up by 91%.<\/p>\n<p>Santos, which had expected to handled 79.1m tonnes last year, actually reported throughput of 81m tonnes, while Navegantes reported traffic being 70% lower than projected in December and January.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Traffic reports for various ports and terminals in Brazil reveal a mixed bag.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":1552,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[29],"tags":[],"sponsor":[],"class_list":["post-1551","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-north-america"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1551","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1551"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1551\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1553,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1551\/revisions\/1553"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1552"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1551"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1551"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1551"},{"taxonomy":"sponsor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/sponsor?post=1551"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}