{"id":2046,"date":"2014-01-14T10:09:00","date_gmt":"2014-01-14T10:09:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/portstrategy.nfdtesting.uk\/greenport-congress\/2014\/01\/14\/strikes-cripple-chilean-ports\/"},"modified":"2026-08-27T13:35:19","modified_gmt":"2026-08-27T12:35:19","slug":"strikes-cripple-chilean-ports","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/news\/south-america\/strikes-cripple-chilean-ports\/","title":{"rendered":"Strikes cripple Chilean ports"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Workers also remain on strike at all the main northern export ports of Antofagasta, Caldera, Cha\u00f1aral, Huasco, Iquique and Tocopilla.<\/p>\n<p>The original dispute erupted in December at Angamos and continued for 20 days, with port operator Ultraport refusing union demands to include non-unionised workers in salary negotiations. Although some dockers returned to work, allowing partial activities to resume, the majority of the workforce continues to strike.<\/p>\n<p>Codelco, which makes extensive use of the northern ports to export copper, says its revenue has been cut by $130m, while the exporters association, Asoex, estimates initial losses of $50m could increase to $400m if vital blueberry exports to the US do not take place.<\/p>\n<p>In a separate dispute, operations at San Antonio, the country&#8217;s biggest port, remain at a standstill. Here, the dispute centres around demands for non-payments of meal allowances dating back to 2005-2013.<\/p>\n<p>Chile&#8217;s other key ports &#8211; Valpara\u00edso, Coquimbo and Arica &#8211; are not affected.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A two-day strike called by dock workers in Chiles southern Biob\u00edo region in support of striking colleagues at the port of Angamos ended on January 10. However, the threat of further action has not been ruled out.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":2047,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"sponsor":[],"class_list":["post-2046","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-south-america"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2046","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2046"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2046\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2048,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2046\/revisions\/2048"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2047"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2046"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2046"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2046"},{"taxonomy":"sponsor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/sponsor?post=2046"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}