{"id":2049,"date":"2014-01-23T13:16:00","date_gmt":"2014-01-23T13:16:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/portstrategy.nfdtesting.uk\/greenport-congress\/2014\/01\/23\/strikes-continue-to-cripple-chilean-ports\/"},"modified":"2026-08-27T13:35:20","modified_gmt":"2026-08-27T12:35:20","slug":"strikes-continue-to-cripple-chilean-ports","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/news\/south-america\/strikes-continue-to-cripple-chilean-ports\/","title":{"rendered":"Strikes continue to cripple Chilean ports"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>CMA CGM has also discharged containers there, with more vessels being diverted all the time. Rodrigo Trucco, director of Coquimbo Port Terminal (TPC) reports an overall 20% hike in traffic.<\/p>\n<p>Although the government has come under much criticism for not intervening to resolve the crisis, 90% of dock workers at Angamos have returned to work after reaching an agreement with management and exports of minerals have resumed. The dispute there lasted more than 30 days.<\/p>\n<p>However, dockworkers in the south of the country, which had earlier returned to work, have now gone back out on strike, while the situation at San Antonio is approaching crisis point.<\/p>\n<p>Antonio B\u00f3rquez, managing director of the main container terminal (SATI) insists that the conflict can only be resolved by tribunals and not by strikes or violence.<\/p>\n<p>The Federation of Fruit Producers has condemned the strike at San Antonio, which has continued for more than two weeks, stressing that it was resulting in \u201ca really untenable situation for everyone working in the fruit sector\u201d.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Disruption at Chilean ports, which has been ongoing since before Christmas, has directly benefited the smaller port of Coquimbo, which has picked up traffic associated with the countrys key fruit export sector.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":2050,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"sponsor":[],"class_list":["post-2049","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-south-america"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2049","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2049"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2049\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2051,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2049\/revisions\/2051"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2050"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2049"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2049"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2049"},{"taxonomy":"sponsor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/sponsor?post=2049"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}