{"id":2088,"date":"2014-07-03T09:52:00","date_gmt":"2014-07-03T08:52:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/portstrategy.nfdtesting.uk\/greenport-congress\/2014\/07\/03\/stalled-queensland-coal-terminals-plans\/"},"modified":"2014-07-03T09:52:00","modified_gmt":"2014-07-03T08:52:00","slug":"stalled-queensland-coal-terminals-plans","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/news\/oceania\/stalled-queensland-coal-terminals-plans\/","title":{"rendered":"Stalled Queensland coal terminals plans"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The plan was backed by Indian entity Adani Enterprises and involved the development of a facility capable of handling 180 million tonnes a year at Dudgeon Point, near the existing terminals of Hay Point and Dalrymple Bay.<\/p>\n<p>North Queensland Bulk Ports (NQBP), which was to have operated the terminals, announced the decision had been made because current and short-term forecast market demand for coal did not support an expansion.<\/p>\n<p>NQBP chief executive Brad Fish said the position may change based on future demand levels, but in the meantime NQBP plans to complete a port master exercise to comply with the proposed Queensland Ports Strategy and then to revisit the scope of the Dudgeon Point project.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Plans to build coal terminals at Dudgeon Point near Mackay in central Queensland have been put on hold due to a lack of demand.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"sponsor":[],"class_list":["post-2088","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-oceania"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2088","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2088"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2088\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2088"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2088"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2088"},{"taxonomy":"sponsor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/sponsor?post=2088"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}