Bill Wyatt believes that creating a state-owned authority, Oregon Shipping Authority (OSA), does not solve the problems which currently face the terminal.<\/p>\n
In a letter to Port Strategy, Mr Wyatt said: \u201cWhile we are open to new ideas, his proposal doesn\u2019t fix what\u2019s broken here or globally.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe understand the desire to seek a solution to the lack of direct container service from Portland and the frustrations by affected Oregon shippers created by the on-going problems at Terminal 6.\u201d<\/p>\n
It was reassured that restoring full container service is the port\u2019s top priority and the Port of Portland believes that demand for direct container service in the region remains strong.<\/p>\n
Mr Wyatt accepted that restoring service at Terminal 6 still remains a challenge: \u201cWe are seeing a carrier industry that is struggling from overcapacity, low freight rates and a significant reshuffling of alliances affecting vessel deployments and routing decisions.\u201d<\/p>\n
Despite the challenges, the Port of Portland is positive that there is a strong market proposition for direct carrier services in Portland. But carriers will need assurances that they will not experience further disruptions and receive a reasonable level of productivity.<\/p>\n
These challenges of local and global dynamics will not change by creating a new authority, which is presented in the Common Sense of Oregon proposal.<\/p>\n
The proposed project is headed up by president of Common Sense for Oregon, Kevin Mannix. It is in its fourth month and aims to present a draft bill for consideration by the Oregon Legislature in January 2017.<\/p>\n
Mr Wyatt continued: \u201cAmong issues with creating a new authority is the concept that would create a redundant government entity that offers the same function as the Port of Portland at a higher cost.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIt would seek state finding to duplicate activities and services the port currently provides to the terminal operator, ICTSI, including police coverage and security, terminal and crane maintenance and berth dredging.\u201d<\/p>\n
Following the lease of the terminal by the Port of Portland to a private operator in 2010, disputes between the terminal operator and the longshoreman\u2019s union resulted in problems at the terminal.<\/p>\n
The proposal from Mr Mannix suggests making longshoreman public employees, but the Port of Portland executive director argued that this would likely not be acceptable to the unions or shipping lines who collectively bargain with the ILWU under the West Coast agreement.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt is worth noting that there is not a single public operated container terminal on the west coast,\u201d explained Mr Wyatt.<\/p>\n
\u201cPublic entities like that Port of Portland have not been considered for membership in the Pacific Maritime Association and it is highly unlikely that they ever would be, which means the new entity could not employ longshoremen directly or as state employees.\u201d<\/p>\n
The Port remains confident that it will provide access to global markets for companies and producers through container service.<\/p>\n
Mr Wyatt\u2019s letter concluded: \u201cWe know that trade cannot wait on a solution and that solutions aren\u2019t simple.\u201d<\/p>\n
The state governor called has called for the port, along with Oregon Department of Transportation, the Oregon Department of Agriculture and Business Oregon, to participate in the Trade and Logistics initiative.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The Port of Portland\u2019s executive director has rejected a recent proposal from president of Common Sense for Oregon for the port\u2019s Terminal 6.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":2329,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[29],"tags":[],"sponsor":[],"class_list":["post-2328","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-north-america"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2328","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2328"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2328\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2330,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2328\/revisions\/2330"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2329"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2328"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2328"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2328"},{"taxonomy":"sponsor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/sponsor?post=2328"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}