{"id":2657,"date":"2017-06-29T06:55:00","date_gmt":"2017-06-29T05:55:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/portstrategy.nfdtesting.uk\/greenport-congress\/2017\/06\/29\/stevedoring-strike-settled-in-spain\/"},"modified":"2026-08-27T13:40:27","modified_gmt":"2026-08-27T12:40:27","slug":"stevedoring-strike-settled-in-spain","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/news\/europe\/stevedoring-strike-settled-in-spain\/","title":{"rendered":"Stevedoring strike settled in Spain"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Anesco\u2019s final proposals were rejected on June 21, leaving trade unions to insist on strikes continuing only in those terminals where full employment rights have not been guaranteed.<\/p>\n<p>Support for the strikes was above 90%, but it fell to just 28% as individual agreements were struck.<\/p>\n<p>Among the terminals that have returned to normal are APM Terminals and TTIA (Algeciras); APMT, Grimaldi, Autoterminal, Best, Balearia, Coma i Riba, Ergransa, Hijos de Jos\u00e9 Mar\u00eda Masiques, Sammer and Setram (Barcelona); OPCSA-MSC and La Luz-Boluda (Las Palmas); and Noatum, MSA, APMT, VTE, Trasmediterr\u00e1nea and Grimaldi (Valencia).<\/p>\n<p>Strikes continue to disrupt operations at ports in northern Spain. In Bilbao, no agreement has been reached with Berg\u00e9, Noatum, Toro y Betolaza and Servicios Log\u00edsticos Portuarios (SLP).<\/p>\n<p>At Santander, the unions are in discussions with five terminal operators working there.<\/p>\n<p>However, while the strike continued in Avil\u00e9s, Gij\u00f3n has returned to normal.<\/p>\n<p>In the meantime, terminal operators Alvargonz\u00e1lez, Berg\u00e9 and Algeposa have quit Anesco, having reportedly lost confidence in its ability to deliver any kind of agreement.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The strike by Spanish stevedores is coming to an end, as stevedores reach individual agreements with terminal operators frustrated by the inability of the owners\u2019 association, Anesco, to negotiate a country-wide agreement.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":2658,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[30],"tags":[],"sponsor":[],"class_list":["post-2657","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-europe"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2657","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2657"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2657\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2659,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2657\/revisions\/2659"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2658"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2657"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2657"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2657"},{"taxonomy":"sponsor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/sponsor?post=2657"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}