{"id":281,"date":"2018-09-24T15:23:00","date_gmt":"2018-09-24T14:23:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/portstrategy.nfdtesting.uk\/greenport-congress\/2018\/09\/24\/strikes-beginning-to-harm-traffic-at-lisbon\/"},"modified":"2026-08-27T13:21:48","modified_gmt":"2026-08-27T12:21:48","slug":"strikes-beginning-to-harm-traffic-at-lisbon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/news\/europe\/strikes-beginning-to-harm-traffic-at-lisbon\/","title":{"rendered":"Strikes beginning to harm traffic at Lisbon"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>However, while Sines and Leix\u00f5es have said that the strikes, due to last until October 8, are having little impact, and Figueira da Foz has reported no impact (labelling the strikes \u201ca fiasco\u201d), this is not the case at the Port of Lisbon.<\/p>\n<p>PSL Navega\u00e7\u00e3o, for example, has introduced congestion surcharges, which will remain in place at Lisbon until the strikes have ended.<\/p>\n<p>CMA CGM subsequently followed suit for its West African service, while MacAndrews has done the same for all vessels sailing into both Lisbon and Setubal.<\/p>\n<p>Maersk has gone further, suspending all services into Lisbon and instead diverting them to Leix\u00f5es, where they will be railed to end users in the Lisbon area.<\/p>\n<p>Lisbon has had three years of labour unrest after initial strikes were called in April 2016.<\/p>\n<p>In June this year, an agreement was reached with the unions guaranteeing rising wages. However, given continuing strikes, the stevedoring companies have effectively torn up the deal.<\/p>\n<p>The unions are demanding better working conditions and an end to payment differentials for workers doing the same job.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A series of strikes called by the Sindicato dos Estivadores e da Actividade Log\u00edstica port union in Portugal against anti-union and exploitative labour measures is slowly but surely beginning to have an impact on the country\u2019s seven main ports.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":282,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[30],"tags":[],"sponsor":[],"class_list":["post-281","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-europe"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/281","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=281"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/281\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":283,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/281\/revisions\/283"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/282"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=281"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=281"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=281"},{"taxonomy":"sponsor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/sponsor?post=281"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}