Finance always came with strings attached. Today, the strings are increasingly \u2018green\u2019 or, more broadly, sustainable. As concern for the environment reaches into every area of business and industry, so the expectations around sustainability are taking centre stage.<\/p>\n
The past few months have seen a series of announcements around sustainable loans, finance and investments in the ports and shipping world, from the news that Australia\u2019s Port of Newcastle has secured A$515m in sustainability-linked loans to COSCO Shipping Ports announcing the launch of its green finance framework.<\/p>\n
As Malin H\u00f6gberg, Director Corporate Legal at the Swedish Club, says in the P&I club\u2019s annual report, many shipping companies are voluntarily committed to their environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) approach, but the industry is also seeing pressure from financial institutions and other business partners with initiatives such as the Poseidon Principles and the Sea Cargo Charter.<\/p>\n
\u201cPeople want to invest in an organisation that is sustainable and committed and takes responsibility,\u201d she says. \u201cAs a Club, we have to be more transparent about the ESG risks we see and how we work to limit that impact. We have to respond to more stringent laws for financial reporting. At the same time, shipowners are asking what their suppliers are doing in the area, and that \u2013 of course \u2013 includes us. We have many board members who are passionate on this topic, so there is a lot of engagement.\u201d<\/p>\n
In May, the Geneva-based World Association of PPP Units & Professionals (WAPPP) announced that it had established a Port Chapter to address the challenges of public-private partnerships in the port sector. Among its aims \u2013 to support the development of new port projects in accordance with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.<\/p>\n
PPP ESG CRITERIA<\/strong><\/p>\n The trend towards sustainable finance is accelerating, says Erik Wehl, who has been working in the ports sector for 20 years and is chairing the chapter\u2019s steering committee. \u201cProfessionals and institutions operating in the PPP field are increasingly expressing concern about the environment, about the impact of their actions, and generally about their social responsibility,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n \u201cThese concerns are embodied in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Structuring projects with the ESG best practice criteria in mind can actually help PPP projects tap into as-yet not fully utilised financing pools.\u201d<\/p>\n Long-term investors, such as mutual funds, pension funds, insurance companies and sovereign wealth funds, own the vast majority of stock worldwide \u2013 and are increasingly aware of sustainability and long-term performance, says Wehl.<\/p>\n \u201cMultilateral development banks have typically insisted on PPP projects meeting certain environmental and social conditions in order to qualify for financing, but they have sometimes disregarded the governance side. Their excuse is usually that the project is good for the people, regardless; and in some cases, especially in middle income countries, the availability of their financing, coupled sometimes with their political influence, have made it unnecessary for projects to strive to get private or capital market financing.\u201d<\/p>\n Governments also play a role, albeit they may not yet have fully internalised PPP as a means to deliver on the SDGs and to enhance the ESG dimensions, he says. \u201cPPP guidelines are, for example, designed to deliver value for money, which is, of course, important; however, the environmental, social and governance aspects are usually missing.\u201d<\/p>\n This, he says, is largely due to two main elements: first, political decision-makers who want the projects put out for tender as quickly as possible to fulfil political promises, thereby leaving no time for proper environmental and social impact studies as part of project design and preparation, or for interaction with rating agencies to get projects rated; and second, governments frequently lack the funding necessary for proper project preparation.<\/p>\n Wehl says the \u20ac300m sustainability-linked credit facility signed by the Port of Rotterdam in 2019 was the first such green facility for a major European port. The pricing is linked to sustainability indicators, \u201cwhich reflects the borrower\u2019s key sustainability initiatives; the port aims to be emission-free by 2050,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n He also highlights the very recent example of Aviva Investors completing an ESG-linked interest rate swap with BNP Paribas, which has been provided to Associated British Ports. \u201cAs part of the deal, a discount is offered to ABP on its hedging rate, provided it meets certain ESG KPIs, including a significant reduction in CO2 emissions by 2030,\u201d he says. \u201cThe transaction is also interesting in the sense that it highlights lenders\u2019 commitment to innovating in sustainability-linked finance for port operators and other clients.\u201d<\/p>\n When the ABP deal was announced, Matthew Ponsonby, Head of Global Banking at BNP Paribas UK, said: \u201cIncentivising the net zero transition through finance can be a powerful mechanism to accelerate both the corporate and investor decarbonisation trajectory. This innovative transaction in a major sector like UK transportation highlights the value of sustainable finance extending into the derivatives market, whilst also demonstrating the need to support corporates such as ABP in holistically integrating transition targets into their financing needs.\u201d<\/p>\n The ABP deal comes with clear KPI requirements \u2013 but can the idea of \u2018sustainable finance\u2019 actually be a rather woolly term that does little more than tick boxes?<\/p>\n DEFINITION DELIBERATIONS<\/strong><\/p>\n Erik Wehl says sustainable finance generally refers to the process of taking ESG considerations into account when making investment decisions, leading to more long-term investments in sustainable economic activities and projects.<\/p>\n However: \u201cIt is right that various definitions \u2013 or labels \u2013 exist of what sustainable finance is, for example \u2018green financing\u2019 or \u2018socially responsible investments\u2019, etc. and different organisations, such as the European Union, OECD or even some multilateral development banks, apply their own definitions.\u201d<\/p>\n WAPPP generally accepts the definition linking sustainable finance to ESGs, but advocates for the world of PPP to go beyond that to link it with the SDGs, he says. \u201cESG tends to refer mainly to two out of the five Ps of the SDGs. These are: People, Planet, Peace, Prosperity and Partnership. We consider Peace and Prosperity-related dimensions to be of equal importance for sustainability, as are People and Planet.\u201d<\/p>\n Sustainable finance: experience and initiatives<\/strong><\/p>\n April 2021: May 2021: How green is your money \u2013 or someone else\u2019s? Felicity Landon analyses the push for sustainability in loans, finance and investments.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":660,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[],"sponsor":[],"class_list":["post-659","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-concessions-investments"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/659","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=659"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/659\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":661,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/659\/revisions\/661"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/660"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=659"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=659"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=659"},{"taxonomy":"sponsor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport-congress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/sponsor?post=659"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\n
SFL Corporation, the Bermuda-based ship owning and chartering company, placed US$150m in senior and unsecured sustainability-linked bonds due in May 2026. <\/p>\n
COSCO Shipping Ports launched its green finance framework; verified by Hong Kong Quality Assurance Agency. It will be a guideline in funding eligible green projects via green bonds or loans and regulating the use of proceeds, and facilitate future financing arrangements, said COSCO. The port operator said it would continue to support national policy by integrating green finance and sustainability into its business operations to further attract green finance investors.<\/p>\n\n