{"id":10247,"date":"2016-10-11T08:58:00","date_gmt":"2016-10-11T07:58:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/portstrategy.nfdtesting.uk\/greenport\/2016\/10\/11\/budget-squeeze-hits-mexican-ports\/"},"modified":"2016-10-11T08:58:00","modified_gmt":"2016-10-11T07:58:00","slug":"budget-squeeze-hits-mexican-ports","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/news\/south-america\/budget-squeeze-hits-mexican-ports\/","title":{"rendered":"Budget squeeze hits Mexican ports"},"content":{"rendered":"<\/p>\n<p>At present, only extension work at the ports of Veracruz and Isla del Carmen have funds allocated to them. In the case of former, it will receive $40.7m as opposed to the $50.9m this year, while the latter is to get just $16.7m, compared with $32.6m this year.<\/p>\n<p>Losing out could be the major new port at Matamoros, where investment of $32.6m was allocated in the 2016 budget.<\/p>\n<p>Other projects at risk include those at Coatzacoalcos, Seybaplaya, and Guaymas, for which $2.9m, $11.7m and $13.2m respectively were included in this year\u2019s budget forecast.<\/p>\n<p>Infrastructure spend by the government is being cut by 27.2% in 2017.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It appears that, of the 13 ongoing port projects in Mexico, 11 are at risk of having no continuity funding available to them in the 2017 federal budget.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[56],"tags":[],"sponsor":[],"class_list":["post-10247","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-south-america"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10247","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10247"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10247\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10247"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10247"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10247"},{"taxonomy":"sponsor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/sponsor?post=10247"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}