While not in the original terminal development plans, all suggested infrastructure and design improvements will be entirely financed entirely by APM Terminals Callao.<\/p>\n
Fentenapu, the trade union linked to the National Port Company ENAPU, which had formerly operated Callao North Terminal, continues to react negatively to the proposal.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt would be unacceptable for the Ministry of Transport and Communications to allow APM Terminals to manage an addendum to modify the basis of its concession contract for Callao\u2019s North Terminal. It would be using the same trickery as Odebrecht and all that of other corrupt authorities that are being discovered,\u201d said Jorge Garc\u00eda Far\u00edas, of Fentenapu.<\/p>\n
Before being allowed to make changes, he wants APM Terminals to respond to 6,000 complaints made by users to Ositran and also boost productivity above levels established by previous port operator Enapu.<\/p>\n
APM Terminals pointed out that, contrary to some beliefs, Fentenapu does not represent APM Terminals\u2019 workers at the terminal. It also stressed that it has successfully concluded phases 1 & 2 of the modernisation of the terminal, investing over $460m, which included additional investments to improve the terminal\u00b4s infrastructure.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
APM Terminals\u2019 proposal to the Peruvian government to improve and optimise its North Terminal at the port of Callao to reflect changes in the Peruvian market continues to court controversy.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":10891,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[56],"tags":[],"sponsor":[],"class_list":["post-10890","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-south-america"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10890","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10890"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10890\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10892,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10890\/revisions\/10892"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10891"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10890"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10890"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10890"},{"taxonomy":"sponsor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/sponsor?post=10890"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}