{"id":9720,"date":"2016-03-02T17:30:00","date_gmt":"2016-03-02T17:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/portstrategy.nfdtesting.uk\/greenport\/2016\/03\/02\/black-sea-container-market-2015-review\/"},"modified":"2016-03-02T17:30:00","modified_gmt":"2016-03-02T17:30:00","slug":"black-sea-container-market-2015-review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/news\/bulk-handling\/black-sea-container-market-2015-review\/","title":{"rendered":"Black Sea container market 2015 review"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In terms of full containers, 1,628,797 TEU, the five countries suffered a total drop of 12.18% compared to the same period last year.<\/p>\n<p>Although there was a slight increase of turnover in Bulgaria and Romania, Ukraine suffered a 26% decrease, while Russia and Georgia\u2019s turnover both decreased by 13%.<\/p>\n<p>Export volumes in the area increased by 22% compared to 2014 with Georgia increasing its volume by 18.99%. Although Ukraine\u2019s export volume did drop by a substantial 14%.<\/p>\n<p>Despite this, imports to the region decreased by 20%, this was largely effected by the import volume drop of 36% in Ukraine.<\/p>\n<p>All countries saw a decrease in import volumes for the period of time, apart from Romania which increased its import volumes by 2%.<\/p>\n<p>The top-five container terminals of the region in 2015 changed their positions in total volume handled.<\/p>\n<p>DPW in Constanta, Romania and APMT Poti, Georgia, remained in first and second place respectively.<\/p>\n<p>While NLE, Novorossyisk, Russia moved from the third to the fourth place and HPC Ukraine in Odessa, Ukraine moved up to third.<\/p>\n<p>NUTEP, also in Novorossiysk fell to fifth, all of these terminals except DPW suffered volume drop in 2015 compared to 2014.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Black Sea container terminals of Ukraine, Romania, Russia, Georgia and Bulgaria handled 2,294,848 TEU in 2015.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[67],"tags":[],"sponsor":[],"class_list":["post-9720","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bulk-handling"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9720","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9720"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9720\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9720"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9720"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9720"},{"taxonomy":"sponsor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/sponsor?post=9720"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}