{"id":9968,"date":"2010-03-28T09:34:00","date_gmt":"2010-03-28T08:34:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/portstrategy.nfdtesting.uk\/greenport\/2010\/03\/28\/urban-mobility-a-question-of-balance\/"},"modified":"2026-08-27T14:55:57","modified_gmt":"2026-08-27T13:55:57","slug":"urban-mobility-a-question-of-balance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/news\/projects-initiatives\/urban-mobility-a-question-of-balance\/","title":{"rendered":"Urban mobility: a question of balance"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Last autumn, the European Commission adopted an Action Plan on Urban Mobility. The Action Plan proposes 20 concrete measures to help local, regional and national authorities achieve their goals for sustainable urban mobility. The Action Plan is a follow-up to the Green Paper on Urban Mobility that was adopted two years earlier in September 2007.<\/p>\n<p>The European Federation of Inland Ports (EFIP) welcomes the initiative taken by the European Commission to raise the debate on urban mobility at a European level. Indeed, even if local authorities are best placed to define and implement urban mobility policies it is clear that urban transport systems are an integral element of the European transport system. Rightly, the Commission stresses that urban mobility is a central component of long distance transport since most of the transport starts, passes through or ends in an urban area. Urban transport is as such a vital element of a competitive and sustainable transport system. And, of course, it is not to the European level to decide on how a town should organise its mobility and answer to the challenges they face. But Europe can play a role when it comes to exchanging best practices, promoting solutions and advising local authorities on the way forward. Moreover, Europe can help local authorities in pushing for less straight forward but good and sustainable solutions for their transport problems.<\/p>\n<p>And if we are now looking more specifically at the role inland ports can play in contributing to a sustainable urban transport policy, we identify three priorities:<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Inland ports offer efficient interconnection points for the trans-European transport network in urban areas.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The European Commission stresses that urban areas should provide efficient interconnection points for the trans-European transport network, and offer \u201clast mile\u201d transport for both freight and passengers. EFIP believes that inland ports can play an important role in providing an efficient interconnection point between road transport and other environmentally friendly modes of transport. An inland port is functioning as a real \u201cgate\u201d and access point to waterborne and rail transport. The other way round, inland ports can help in making the \u201clast mile\u201d transport as efficient and limited as possible by bringing the goods in a sustainable way into the towns, from where they can be distributed to their final destination. Moreover, inland ports are becoming more and more clusters of urban logistic services. They offer logistic service providers efficient and flexible choices and allow customers to combine the different transport modes depending on the demands of the market or the goods to transport and handle.<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Urban areas: Restore the balance between logistic and housing needs<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"inline_image inline_image_right image_size_med fullsize zoom\" data-attachment=\"90780\" data-sequence=\"1\"><button class=\"show-fullscreen\" data-url=\"\/attachment?attype=P&amp;atcode=90780&amp;storycode=82021\">Show Fullscreen<\/button><\/p>\n<p class=\"picture\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Waste barge being loaded\" src=\"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2010\/03\/01_90780_page-104a.webp\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"lazyloaded wp-image-9970\" width=\"492\" height=\"381\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2010\/03\/01_90780_page-104a.webp 492w, https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2010\/03\/01_90780_page-104a-300x232.webp 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 492px) 100vw, 492px\" \/><\/p>\n<div class=\"inline_meta\">\n<p class=\"inline_title\">Waste Loading<\/p>\n<p class=\"inline_caption\">Waste barge being loaded<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>In its Communication on the future of transport, the Commission foresees a continuing increase of the European population residing in urban areas, rising to 84% in 2050. This urban sprawl does not only imply more transport needs and mobility problems for individuals, but above all a fast growing demand for goods to be delivered in towns (consumer goods, building materials, etc). Historically, a lot of towns were built along the water or at the crossing of two waterways for the precise reason that a waterway was needed to supply a town. Mainly due to the rapid development of road transport, river transport in towns went in decline and the river bank areas ran down quickly. During the past few decades, however, towns have rediscovered the attractiveness of the riverside and river banks have become the dream location for real estate and housing projects, leisure activities and other non-river related use. As a consequence the space along the waterways has often lost its specific logistics function. In fact, cities risk giving away a part of the solution to their congestion problems. The inland city ports which were originally well-nestled in the town and their activities are often getting squeezed and will not be able to respond adequately to the growing supply and distribution needs of towns.<\/p>\n<p>EFIP strongly believes the logistics benefits of an inland port in a town should be revalorised. Facing the challenge of increasing urban congestion, local authorities cannot solely restrict the river and its banks to housing, offices and purely panoramic purposes. Inland waterway transport and inland ports can contribute in finding sustainable solutions for the increasing demands in town supply and distribution of goods. This implies, however, a rebalancing between the different functions of the river banks, between the needs of logistics needs on the one hand, and housing and leisure on the other. If needed, some space along the waterway should be safeguarded for logistical purposes or other river-related uses. Since urban distribution of goods is becoming more and more important, projects for the sustainable distribution of goods in and to towns should get the necessary attention in European programmes. At the same time, a good access to the port area should be guaranteed. EFIP finally stresses the need for the municipal and regional authorities to involve the port authorities when preparing urban mobility plans. Internalisation of external costs of transport in urban areas: waste transport as a pilot project.<\/p>\n<p>The Commission points out that EU policy does not prevent the non-discriminatory application of regulatory charges in urban areas to reduce traffic congestion and environmental impacts.<\/p>\n<p>EFIP would like to encourage the Commission and competent authorities in the Member States to start by introducing the \u201csmart pricing\u201d in one segment of transport, namely waste transport. \u201cSmart pricing\u201d should be introduced for the transport of waste, in particular between the collect centres and the recovery plants. At the same time, public tenders for waste transport should include the obligation to use more sustainable transport modes. Removing and managing the fast increasing waste amounts in towns is one of the challenges of urbanisation in Europe. Too often, the environmental advantages of collecting and recovering waste are lost because of the transport.<\/p>\n<p>Over recent years, many inland ports have built up experience in finding sustainable solutions for the collection of waste or the transport of waste from the collection point to the waste recovery plants. Even if successful, these environment-friendly methods of waste removal are often more expensive than truck transport. Because of budgetary constraints, the use of the waterway for the removal of urban waste remains under threat. A price signal should help competent authorities and waste treatment companies in choosing sustainable solutions for the transport of waste. On 2 December, EFIP organised a lunch meeting in the European Parliament on this issue. At the meeting, representatives of the French ports of Lille and Paris and of the Belgian port of Li\u00e8ge presented their best practices regarding the transport of waste by water. EFIP\u2019s president Willy Robijns gave a presentation of \u201cWaste ship\u201d, a project aimed at shifting waste streams from road to inland waterways. All speakers emphasised the need for space along the water, political will and a mental shift.<\/p>\n<p>To conclude, it is time to consider urban mobility as an integral part of the transport chain. But it is also time to consider that ongoing urbanisation does not only imply more movement of people but also and not at least of goods to be delivered in and out of town. It is time finally, to use the potential the port has to help the town in solving its transport and logistics needs.<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Isabelle.Ryckbost@espo.be<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>www.inlandports.be<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Inland ports can play an important role in offering sustainable solutions for urban mobility in and around towns and decongesting European towns.Last autumn, the European Commission adopted an Action Plan on Urban Mobility. The Action Plan proposes 20 concrete measures to help local, regional and national authorities achieve their goals for sustainable urban mobility. The Action Plan is a follow-up to the Green Paper on Urban Mobility that was adopted two years earlier in September 2007.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":9969,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[595,8],"tags":[520,91],"sponsor":[],"class_list":["post-9968","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-projects-initiatives","category-projects-initiatives-greenport","tag-inland-ports","tag-waste"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9968","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9968"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9968\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9971,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9968\/revisions\/9971"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9969"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9968"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9968"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9968"},{"taxonomy":"sponsor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portstrategy.com\/greenport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/sponsor?post=9968"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}