Second can be better than first

COMMENT: The poor state of health of the container shipping sector has prompted a lot of speculation about the implications for the container terminal operating sector, writes Mike Mundy.

Mainly, this centres on the industry being required to make substantial investments to cater for larger vessels on the one hand and on the other the probability of shipping lines and consortia seeking to ‘share their pain’ with terminal operators by seeking reductions in container handling charges.

The latter action is also seen as the natural outcome of the larger shipping blocs now being formed whether this be via merger and acquisition or the formation of mega alliances or both.

 

There are certainly signs of this in a number of key ports around the world serving the larger capacity vessels, especially where those ports have recently added major new capacity. Where there are competing terminals in a major port there is unease about who will secure the essential business volume flowing out of the formation of the new mega alliances. A winner and loser scenario can be seen certainly in the early life of new terminals active in the same port or even in the same coastal range.

 

Secondly, some terminals are clearly concerned about what happens in the wake of acquisitions and mergers. Will long established shipping line customer/terminal relationships be dissolved by the new management? What will the attitude be to existing contracts, especially long-term contracts, and the tariff provisions contained therein?

 

To be involved in the top tier of high capacity container handling is not, frankly, a great place to be at present, unless of course you are ‘the only game in town’.

 

While there are still investment and tariff issues, a healthier place to be, generally speaking, is in the second tier of container handling – medium size terminals where the per move yield characteristics are stronger. There is a greater incidence here of exclusivity of operation and as such greater bargaining power with lines.

 

Equally, where there are two medium size terminals there is also the opportunity to join forces as has recently been seen, in a ground-breaking way, between Miami’s South Florida Container Terminal and the Port of Miami Terminal Operating Company, two of the port’s three container terminal operators. The arrangement between the two terminals effectively mirrors the approach of lines and creates a ‘conference agreement’ facilitating common pricing and operational practices.

LATEST PRESS RELEASES

NEW CRANE ENTERS SERVICE AT WARRENPOINT PORT FOLLOWING £3 MILLION INVESTMENT

Warrenpoint Port has commissioned a new crane and has commenced the refurbishment of two other crane... Read more

Bigger share of modal split envisaged for inland shipping in the Baltic Sea Region

A vision for inland waterway transport (IWT) in the Baltic Sea Region as well as means to strengthen... Read more

QTerminals reaches new container and cargo handling milestones in record time

Over two million containers and five million tonnes of cargo handled Read more

Bendezu Port Equipment delivered two GOTTWALD HMK 6407 B from BELGIUM to SPAIN

Bendezu Port Equipment GmbH, an international trading company offering second-hand port equipment, h... Read more

ShibataFenderTeam is a member of PIANC Working Group “Guidelines for the Design of Fender Systems”

ShibataFenderTeam looks forward to the fruitful exchange with all WG members and trusts that the out... Read more

CIRCLE S.p.A.: continues its growth abroad with a new cooperation with Bulgarian Ports Infrastructure Company.

Circle S.p.A. (“Circle”), a Company leading its own Group specialized in process and management cons... Read more

View all