Head to head
DP World's Yarimca is one of many Marmara developments on the boil
There's a clash of personalities between the Black and Marmara seas, as Stevie Knight discovers
Black Sea ports are looking at growth again, not least because the surrounding countries, bar two, are actually outside Eurozone. However standing at the gateway to future development is the Turkish Sea of Marmara, through which all Black Sea port traffic must pass.
Rather than lumping the Sea of Marmara together with the Black Sea, you should actually consider this area as “a well defined competitor”, says Andrew Griffiths of BMT.
Firstly, Mr Griffiths points out that the Black Sea countries are starting from a very low baseline after the economic devastation of 2007 and 2008. It’s worth noting that Georgia’s projected 6% growth, Russia's 4% and Ukraine’s 3% increase is still being driven largely by factors outside Europe: there’s a huge agribulk industry on the up with, for example, grain exports from the Ukraine going ‘all points east’, plus a rising steel draw from the UAE, Saudi Arabia and Qatar which is adding to volumes.
However, one big issue, as Mr Griffiths says, is that large box ships could start to go from the Far East via the Suez Canal through to the Marmara ports then overland, avoiding the bottleneck of the Bosphorus entirely.
The Marmara region has some big developments on the boil: DP World is putting in a 1m teu terminal at Yarimca, and there is also Tekirdag Asyaport which is planned at 2m teu. There is the old Ambarli port which is gaining from an upgrade and a number of other facilities being planned further along the coast, so the Sea of Marmara has a projected capacity of 11.4m teu by 2020.
Steve Wray of OSC explains the strength of the Turkish economy is driving both domestic export and imports, reaching up from the lower end textiles to automotive units which arrive in parts and leave assembled. Despite the Euro’s recent troubles, and a little umming and erring from the EU about some of the country’s politics, Turkey still has a desire to get into the EU and foster trade relations. “If you are used to having extreme currency fluctuations and been forced to suffer a devalued lira a number of times, then being inside Europe could look a better bet,” says Mr Wray, including for attracting port investment.
However, operations even at the four largest Marmara facilities of Marport, Kumport, Yilport and Evyap aren’t doing as well as they could be, says Michiel Ybema of APM Terminals, with lengthy average container dwell times.
He is, however, quick to point out that this isn’t down to lack of investment but more to the nature of how the ports started life: “At the moment there is no purpose built box terminal in the area, they are all conversions of ports that were originally built to handle different cargoes and vessel sizes.”
That means in some cases the yard areas are not designed to take the pressure from five or six layers of full containers, so the stacking height has to be limited. Mr Ybema adds the yards are often quite tight and sometimes have warehouses in the way, which makes it challenging to handle, store and retrieve containers.
Despite this, Mr Wray points out that if vessels continue to increase in size, they will favour deeper water terminals and larger landside areas. “This is one reason why Turkey is rising: Izmir and Ambarli have gained calls and it’s feasible that Turkish ports can recreate themselves at transhipment hubs, just as Constanta in Romania did in the past.”
Constanta itself probably hopes not. The port is hoping for a change of fortune as 2008 saw it peaking at 1.4m teu. A large part of its traffic was transhipment however and this just evaporated leaving 2010 volumes only reaching 556,000 teu.
A second box terminal which had reached the planning stage was eventually not put out to tender due to lack of interest, and DP World froze all expansion plans. Still, Mr Griffiths is certain that it’s a star that will rise again: “Constanta still has the biggest potential of any existing port in the area.” While the current capacity is 1.65m teu, by 2020 capacity will have risen to 3.4m teu.
One point is that it has land available for development unlike quite a number of the other city ports which have limited landside potential: for example, Varna in Bulgaria has expansion issues and despite Odessa’s size it’s going to be struggling for room against the city’s cruise and tourism development.
Interestingly, Constanta has a canal link, via Agigea to the Danube which passes fairly close to the city and goes on to Central and Eastern Europe. Romanian businessman Calin Petculescu explains that the Danube already has bulk and container traffic, with a regular service as far as Budapest so DP World and, to a lesser extent, APMT (which has a multimodal facility there) both have an interest in developing this strand.
Mr Petculescu adds that you can’t ignore that 1,250 km of the Danube winds through Romania, and already provides a link for both Romania and Serbia all the way from the Black Sea and up, Regensburg, to Rotterdam.
“The only problem is the draft,” he says, which is “variable”, adding that some deepening measures - including the link between the river and Bucharest - have already had EU grant money, which unfortunately “evaporated”, leaving the job only half done. However, he is certain that the area, with its Danube link, is at the heart of a growth industry.
So, the dreams could be big. “Constanta lies only 700 km from the Suez so when – not if – all the links are put in place the port may even draw in lucrative traffic from the Asia to Eastern and Central Europe routes,” says Mr Griffiths. So, the dreams could be big. “Constanta lies only 700km from the Suez so when – not if – all the links are put in place the port may even draw in lucrative traffic from the Asia to Eastern and Central Europe routes,” says Mr Griffiths.
The obvious problem is that there are virtually no modern terminals on the Danube, and investment in container yards is sorely needed. “So what you have is the classic chicken and egg situation,” says Mr Griffiths. “Once links are in place you’ll see things start gaining momentum.”
However, there are murmurs of intrigue. Some sources say that it will never be allowed to develop as a short route from Far East, as the Turks are basically choking the Bosphorus for their own ends; while depth isn’t so much of a problem there are two existing low air-draft bridges in place and third being built. In short, it’s hard to ignore the fact that Turkey has an interest in limiting sizes through the strait as it means more traffic gets routed to Marmara.
Links to related companies and recent articles ...
- APM virus shutdown contributed to Maersk Q2 2017 loss of USD$264m
- Running a fever
- Legal intervention over at TCQ
- APMT proposes Callao design amendment
- Construction defects put back Moín opening
- APMT crippled by Petya cyber attack
- Major Tangier order for Bromma
- APMT terminals re-open after cyber crash
- Owners and unions at loggerheads in Spain
- Speculation over Adani bid for Pipavav
- "No confidence" in APM Terminals Gothenburg, says SDU
- APM Terminals rejects Fentenapu accusations
- Delays expected for Moín box terminal
- APMT makes Elizabeth 'big ship' ready
- GPS error results in revamped access road at Moín
- Ports America sniffs around Quetzal concession
- APMT adds automated cranes to Tangier port
- APMT refutes Valencia 'collapse' claims
- APM Terminals brings COSCO onboard at Vado
- Global operators spearhead environmental initiative
- Panama Canal issues request for proposals
- APMT’s Fejfer to step down
- APMT at risk of losing Callao concession
- APM LA terminal gives cranes a lift
- APMT to invest in Port Elizabeth terminal
- Will Maersk review its port assets?
- Terminal operators look to consolidate ownership
- All change for Buenos Aires
- CMIT 'out of the storm'
- Rotterdam streamlines inter-terminal moves
- APMT’s ‘terminal by module’ vision
- NLE leapfrogs APMT Poti in Black Sea ranking
- Gothenburg labour talks resume
- Alliances, uncertainties and opportunities
- A seat at the table
- Catering for ultra large boxships
- APMT offers box weighing services at select terminals
- Investigation on Puerto Quetzal bribes
- Four operators pre-qualify for Corozal
- Need for a port shakeup?
- Longer horizon
- Kalmar to deliver 19 shuttles to new APM terminal
- High risk, high reward?
- APMT sets stage for Bahrain IPO
- APM Terminals chases Itajaí concession extension
- Expanding Costa Rica’s export facilities
- APMT brings in Qingdao at Vado
- Green initiative ends on a high note
- Graduates for APM leadership
- APM's Kaohsiung operation goes to Hanjin
- APM plans Santos terminal
- Rotterdam terminal goes a windy green
- APM Terminals blows hot and cold at Tanger-Med
- Injury time down for APM
- NYK pulls out of Tacoma terminal agreement
- APM sees global port projects 'back on track' by 2015
- Big ships still pose a challenge
- Indian infrastructure talks take in concerns
- Port operators reveal carbon stats to tackle climate change
- APM to take over Gothenburg’s Skandia container terminal
- Thai flooding disrupts export volumes
- APM takeover of Gothenburg terminal approved
- APM wins Lázaro Cárdenas concession
- Nigerian ports struggle with strikes
- Pensions resolution has 'broader context'
- APM Terminals sees potential in India
- APMT Callao investment assured
- APMT focuses on African integration
- APMT injury and CO2 wins
- APMT seals Moin concession deal
- Santos Brasil and APMT fight for Brazilian terminals
- APM uses wind to power terminal
- RTG conversion for Laem Chabang
- Salalah invests to double capacity
- APMT in $4bn Virginia operations bid
- APMT kits out Maasvlakte II
- APMT's Cai Mep transforms Vietnam
- New private investor for Pipavav
- Costa Rica win for APM Terminals
- APMT commits to fishing deal in Callao
- Judicial review of Lázaro Cárdenas tender
- MSC and CMA CGM withdraw Virginia opposition
- India container freight station for APMT
- APMT invests in Russian market
- Head to head
- ABB wins remote control crane contracts
- Breaking hard ground
- Suez terminal handles world’s largest vessels
- APMT homes in on Nigeria
- Power of politics
- Negotiating the obstacles
- APMT refutes ‘iron fist’ claim
- Keeping up the pace
- APMT’s bid to improve Kenyan bottlenecks
- Discussing Turkish prospects
- APMT to operate major Turkish port
- APMT fixes sights on Abidjan
- APMT Maasvlakte II receives ARMGs
- Dispute hangs over Abidjan concession
- APMT prepares for high growth markets
- APMT Liberia on track
- Health and safety
- Eastern Europe drives port growth
- Africa tackles its risk culture
- APMT to upgrade Lagos
- Needles in haystacks
- Value of comparison
- APM steams ahead with Costa Rica terminal
- Taking Oman's lead
- Military takes control of Mexican port
- New Jordan hub opens for business
- Moller-Maersk set for further expansion?
- Virginia works to stay on top of “chronic losses”
- Mexico to double capacity within six years
- APMT begins new Angolan chapter
- APMT reaches new heights
- APMT sells off US terminal
- Big sets the agenda
- APMT showcases Callao hub
- ABB electrifies APMT Mexican terminal
- APMT seals the deal for Costa Rica terminal
- APMT rebuffs 'illegal' Aqaba strike
- Lean and mean
- APMT hits back at Monrovia claims
- Ebola fails to dent Monrovia trade
- Locked up and out
- Wind power for Maasvlakte II
- Winners and losers
- Safety at the sharp end
- Strike action hits APM Terminals’ Callao
- Sound the trumpet
- ‘Gamers’ aren’t the answer to automation, says APMT
- APMT commits to Ghana
- APM Terminals makes Mobile moves
- APM Terminals fined for Callao operations
- Not if, but when
- APM Terminals eyes Greek port concessions
- APMT invests in Italian reefer terminal
- APM Terminals makes moves into Colombia
- Port industry leaders ‘go green’
- APM Terminals acquires Grup Maritim
- Piraeus port sale delayed
- APMT kits out Savono-Vado
- APM Terminals in Grup Maritim TCB takeover
- Pipavav’s profits fall
- APMT cements China multi-purpose ambitions
- Growth models