Can US port security stand up to the cuts?
Ten years on from 9/11, US ports are being asked to enhance their security further, but it’s a troubling issue in the recent environment of budgetary cuts.
The American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA) points out that in the decade since the World Trade Centre attack there have been substantial security gains.
However, among the materials Navy SEALS found in Osama Bin Laden’s Pakistan hideout were plans showing the maritime industry is still a key Al-Qaida target.
Kurt Nagle, AAPA president and CEO said, “Clearly, America’s ports have become much more secure since 9/11. In addition to guarding against cargo theft, drug smuggling, human trafficking and stowaways, ports and their law enforcement partners have added the protection of people and facilities from terrorism to their security plate.” Mr Nagle added, “There’s no question that more investment in security equipment, infrastructure, technology, personnel and training will be needed.”
Given ongoing threats such as these, the seaport industry is asking US congress and administration make port security a top funding priority in current and future appropriations rather than considering it for funding cuts.
Mr Nagle said, “Regrettably, the more than 50% funding level cut recommended for FEMA’s State and Local Program grants, which includes the Port Security Grant Program, could impact the current security capabilities of many US ports as well as hamper their ability to carry out their five-year port protection plans.”
Port and industry leaders will pause on Sunday, September 11, at AAPA’s annual convention to remember those tragically lost in the terrorist attacks: among the victims were 84 industry colleagues from the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey who perished at the World Trade Centre.