US ports oppose crane tariffs

The tariff, proposed by the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) under the Trump Administration, aims to counter China’s dominance in critical supply chain equipment but has drawn sharp criticism from the port industry.

AAPA president and chief executive Cary Davis testified at a USTR hearing, representing the port sector alongside other industry stakeholders. The AAPA also submitted formal comments expressing its firm opposition.

“Applying a new 100% tariff to Chinese STS cranes will not create a domestic crane manufacturing industry out of thin air,” said Davis, adding that no US manufacturers currently produce STS cranes and that increased costs would burden ports needing to replace ageing equipment or equip new terminals.

While AAPA supports reshoring key manufacturing sectors, the organisation stressed that the proposed tariff is premature and counterproductive.

In its submission, AAPA urged the USTR to:

• Rescind planned fees on foreign vehicle carriers that could cost US$1 million per vessel;
• Reduce tariffs on Chinese-built, owned and operated vessels;
• Clarify technical definitions and the role of ports in enforcement.

AAPA warns that without adjustments, the policy could hinder US port competitiveness and economic growth.